Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate
Introduction
In 2015, almost 800 million people were still undernourished (FAO, 2015a). This includes insufficient access to balanced supply of macronutrients (carbohydrates, proteins and fats) but also “hidden hunger”, i.e. lack of, or inadequate intake of micronutrients, resulting in various forms of malnutrition, such as anaemia or vitamin A deficiency (FAO, 2015a).
Food from animal sources contributes 18% of global calories (kcal) consumption and 25% of global protein consumption (FAOSTAT, 2016). But it also makes an important contribution to food security through the provision of high-quality protein and a variety of micronutrients – e.g. vitamin A, vitamin B-12, riboflavin, calcium, iron and zinc – that can be locally difficult to obtain in adequate quantities from plant-source foods alone (Randolph et al., 2007, Murphy and Allen, 2003). Livestock's contribution goes beyond the production of meat, milk and eggs, however, and a number of factors determine their overall impact on food security (Gerber et al., 2015). Positive contributions include: (1) the direct supply of essential macro- and micro-nutrients; (2) the contribution of domesticated animals to agricultural productivity through manure and draught power; and (3) the income generated by livestock production at household and national level. Potentially negative contributions to food security include: (1) animal feed rations containing products that can also serve as human food; (2) the fact that animal feed may be produced on land suitable for human food production; and (3) the relatively low efficiency of animals in converting feed into human-edible products.
This paper aims to inform one important dimension of the debate on the contribution of animal production to food security. Beef production, in particular, is often criticized for its very high consumption of grain, with cited figures varying between 6 kg and 20 kg of grain per kg of beef produced (Eshel et al., 2014, Elliott, 2012; Godfray et al., 2010; Garnett, 2009). The upper bound of this range is, however, based on feedlot beef production, which accounts for 7% of global beef output according to Gerber et al. (2015) and FAO (2009), and 13% according to this analysis. It does not apply to the other forms of beef production that produce the remaining 87–93% of beef. Indeed, debate on the subject often lacks recognition of the wide diversity in production systems and in the goods and services delivered by livestock (Smith, 2015). And while some of the global discussion on food security may address the question of the feed/food competition, it often fails to mention the diversity of animal diets around the world and the various levels of efficiency in production systems (Godfray et al., 2010, Flachowsky, 2010). Some well-documented studies (e.g. Eshel et al., 2014) covering the US livestock sector, are often quoted without clear reference to the geographic context they apply to (e.g. Carrington, 2014), and are therefore wrongly used to inform decision makers, and the public at large. For example, the literature often highlights the supposed efficiency of pigs and poultry in converting feed into meat. But these studies do not take account of the higher share of feed consumed in the form of grains edible by humans and of land suitable for food production used by monogastrics.
The livestock sector is expected to continue to grow. Demand for animal products is increasing in many parts of the world as a result of rising incomes, growing population and urbanization. Global demand for meat and milk is expected to increase by 57% and 48% respectively between 2005 and 2050 (Alexandratos and Bruinsma, 2012). Most of the past decades sector's growth took place in large-scale, specialized monogastric farms (FAO, 2009), and this trend can be expected to continue. This was achieved through an increased reliance by the sector on cultivated forages, grains and oilseed meals, but also on agricultural by-products such as brans, dried distillers’ grains, pulps and molasses.
As this increase in demand for animal source food will have a major impact on global food systems and land use, there is a need to better inform policy makers and consumers about feed use and feed use efficiency in the livestock sector (Capper et al., 2013). To this end, this analysis addresses the food/feed competition looking at two main drivers: the feeding of human-edible materials to animals and the use of arable land to produce animal feed (instead of producing food directly). It relies on a new and unique database and provides broad quantitative estimates of livestock feed rations, feed demand, and related land use. It analyses the composition of feed rations and the efficiency with which human-edible and non-human-edible feed materials are converted into animal-source food and discusses land use implications. This paper is meant to inform policy makers and the wider global community with a quantitative assessment of the role of livestock in current and future food security.
Section snippets
Terminology and feed classification
In this paper, feed rations correspond to both the intake and composition of the feed consumed by livestock. The classification of feed materials is summarized in Fig. 1. It is based first on whether the product from which they are derived is edible by humans (i.e. cereal grains, soybeans, pulses, banana and cassava) or not (roughages such as grass, crop residues and fodder beets, cotton and rape seeds). In the latter case, the feed material is always classified as not human-edible. If the
The global livestock feed ration
The global livestock sector ingested an estimated 6.0 billion tonnes of feed (DM) in 2010. The three major feed materials were grass and leaves (46% or 2.7 million tonnes, Fig. 2 and Table SI 2 in Supplementary Information), followed by crop residues such as straws, stover or sugar-cane tops (19% or 1.1 billion tonnes DM). At global level, human-edible feed materials represented about 14% of the global livestock feed ration. Grains made up only 13% of the ration, but represented 32% of global
Trends, feed demand and land use in the livestock sector
According to the OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook for 2025, and using meat projections as a proxy since milk projections are not broken down by species, the livestock sector is expected to increase by 21% between 2010 and 2025 (Table 3). The fastest-growing subsectors are small ruminants and poultry in non-OECD countries (+32% and +33% respectively, Table SI 17 in Supplementary Information). The pig sector in non-OECD countries is expected to grow by 19%, cattle and buffaloes by 21%. In OECD
Feed/food competition and the role of livestock in the bio-economy
The annual feed intake of livestock (6 billion tonnes DM) represents 60% of the total food and feed combined biomass, including residues and by-products, or about 20% of the global human appropriation of biomass (Pelletier and Tyedmers, 2010, Imhoff et al., 2004; Krausmann et al., 2013).
Today, crop production, processing and the agrifood chains produce large amounts of residues as well as co- and by–products, which constitute nearly 30% of global livestock feed intake. These products will be
Conclusion
Livestock consume about 6 billion tonnes DM as feed per year, of which 86% is made of materials that are currently not eaten by humans. In addition, soybean cakes, which production can be considered as main driver or land-use, represent 4% of the global livestock feed intake. Livestock play a key role in the bio-economy by converting forages, crop residues and agricultural by-products into high-value products and services. The production of global feed requires 2.5 billion ha of land, which is
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the editors and 2 anonymous reviewers as well as Henning Steinfeld, Philippe Lecomte, Gareth Salmon and Harinder Makkar for useful comments.
References (43)
- et al.
Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems
Agric. Syst.
(2005) Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Environ. Sci. Policy
(2009)- et al.
Comparative analysis of the field performances of a reversible animal-drawn prototype and conventional mouldboard ploughs pulled by a single donkey
Soil Tillage Res.
(1997) - et al.
Environmental impacts of beef production: review of challenges and perspectives for durability
Meat Sci.
(2015) - et al.
Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world's grazing lands: modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2015) - et al.
Nutritional importance of animal source foods
J. Nutr.
(2003) - et al.
Feed conversions, ration compositions, and land use efficiencies of major livestock products in US agricultural systems
Agric. Syst.
(2014) Eating meat: constants and changes
Glob. Food Secur.
(2014)- et al.
The effect of nutritional quality on comparing environmental impacts of human diets
J. Clean. Prod.
(2014) Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock
Animal
(2011)